It must be pointed out up front that many of the accusations in this post are disputed by the County Auditor George Danos. They include staff complaints from the auditor's office, an IT forensic report about pornography on the auditor's work computer, and accusations of nonfeasance. I've tried to lay the accusations and the denials out as fairly as possible with links to the documentation available.
If one believes the County Auditor and his public supporters, the controversies laid out in this post are part of a smear campaign to undermine his stance on the County budget and a possible 1/4 cent increase to the Public Safety Sales Tax. Those issues are covered in more detail in a previous Cheat Sheet post here. There is a special study session meeting of the County Board on the specific issue of adding a sale tax referendum to the November ballot tomorrow as well.
The Auditor's critics have pointed to a regular flow of complaints coming from multiple staff members in his office during his tenure. At this month's meeting of the County Board's Labor Committee there was a draft resolution to censure the auditor (page 19 and 20 of the agenda packet PDF). There was a discussion on the complaints received by administrators received in the County Administrator's office in addition to those documented in a recent set of documents made public after a FOIA request.
Those FOIA documents were discussed in a special meeting of the County Board at the beginning of the month and included in the agenda packet for that meeting. Most of that documentation appears to be a list of complaints from at least one staff member of the County Auditor's office. It alleges bizarre and inappropriate behavior and nonfeasance on the part of the Auditor. The discussions in that special meeting and later in the Labor Committee meeting revolved around additional complaints that have been verbally reported, but not officially documented by the staffers themselves.
IT Forensic Report and Pornographic Material:
A brief one page IT Forensic Report in the FOIA documents has received a great deal of attention due to the fact that it noted "compelling documents were found on Danos’ hard drive, which included numerous files which could be construed as pornographic, as well as some images which featured fully naked men."
There has been speculation on what that could mean, from inadvertent pop-up ads to whether the images were actually explicitly pornographic. Multiple members of the County Board from both parties were able to view the images from the IT forensic investigation and described it as "explicit" and "curated" pornography. It was similarly described by the County Executive and administrative staff that observed the material found on the Auditor's computer as part of the forensic investigation.
In the Labor Committee meeting, Director of Administration Michelle Jett pointed out that the initial "bland" language related to the pornographic material may have been due to hopes that the matter had been successfully resolved. Continued staff complaints about inappropriate behavior by the Auditor, however, undermined those hopes.
Munis Log Ins:
The FOIA documents also included records of the Auditor's use of the Munis budget software application. His critics have pointed out a rarity in log ins and accused him of not fulfilling his duties as Auditor. They similarly praised the staff in his office for producing the office's work product in spite of him.
The Auditor disputed those accusations in his recent presentation to the County Board, in which he also disputed the accuracy of the budget director's financial forecast and opposed a sales tax increase. He argued that he can access the Munis budget data in other ways and can work from the generated compiled reports the system sends out.
During the presentation he responded to a number of questions and concerns about his process. He entered in data and updated his Excel spreadsheets in real time as board members raised various items and alleged discrepancies. The Auditor denied any substantial differences with his main point: that he forecasts an ongoing budget surplus and views the budget director's forecasts as fear mongering.
FOIA Request and "Cookie Cutter:"
We haven't been able to confirm who made the very specific and seemingly targeted FOIA request that led to the public release of these documents. In the documents the FOIA request is attributed to someone who calls themselve "Cookie Cutter." Jim Dey, a notable critic of Democratic Party Politics, has repeatedly claimed in recent opinion pieces that "Cookie Cutter" is former Champaign County Democratic Party official (and former Cunningham Township Assessor) Wayne Williams. He initially appeared to base this confirmation on public statements by the Democratic chair of the County Board, Samantha Carter.
Those statements at the April 4th special meeting included accusations against the County Executive being part of some coordinated effort with Wayne Williams to talk to her in the parking lot of the County's Brookens Administrative Center and perhaps other activities. The source of the FOIA request seems more relevant to the Auditor's defenders and issues of intraparty distrust than the accusations themselves.
I'll leave it to the reader to decide what relevance the FOIA requester's identity may or may not have to the content of the documents themselves.
